What's new with Team TTO

May 28, 2020

TTOC to roll out covid19 relief to athletes

The TT Olympic Committee (TTOC) is currently finalising the criteria needed for athletes to benefit…
May 26, 2020

OpEd: The IOC Stands in Solidarity With All Athletes and All Sports

Much has been written lately about the International Olympic Committee (IOC)’s finances. Some of these…
May 26, 2020

Stellar example Duncan teaches art of adaptability

Marcus Duncan knows how to adapt to different circumstances. While other athletes have suffered because…
May 24, 2020

Chow remains focused Olympic rower trains harder during lockdown

For Team Trinidad and Tobago’s top rower Felice Aisha Chow, being defeated by the circumstamces…
May 23, 2020

TTOC President Lewis claims cancellation of Tokyo 2020 would put NOCs in "a big hole"

Trinidad and Tobago Olympic Committee (TTOC) President Brian Lewis claimed the cancellation of the Tokyo…
May 22, 2020

Lewis: Olympic cancellation not good for NOCs

Brian Lewis, president of the T&T Olympic Committee says a great number of National Organising…
May 18, 2020

Mother of invention Athlete Talks, Ultimate Garden Clash born out of Covid-19

I could not have imagined how excited I would get watching on my computer screen…

Tokyo 2021 #1YearToGo

Logo TOKYO 2020 International Olympic Committee
Logo Omega Offical Timekeeper

Cartan Global | Tokyo 2021

Welcome to the Olympic Channel Live

Team TTO on Facebook

Team TTO on Twitter

We're taking the hassle out of paying your bill this month. Here are the many ways you can pay. WeAreHereWithYou… https://t.co/GBNBMYDD2G
Thursday, 28 May 2020 23:52
TTOC to roll out covid19 relief to athletes https://t.co/1TuTjPLeoV
Thursday, 28 May 2020 15:39
Stellar example Duncan teaches art of adaptability https://t.co/GJUPhBuZJI
Wednesday, 27 May 2020 00:48
OpEd: The IOC Stands in Solidarity With All Athletes and All Sports https://t.co/G1TGDaooGA
Wednesday, 27 May 2020 00:48

TeamTTO on Instagram

UPCOMING OLYMPIC GAMES

T&T OLYMPIC TEAM TTO PARTNERS

Let's be clear: this week's report on governance in Winter Olympic sports indicates some modest improvement over the past year in overall standards in the seven Winter Olympic sports federations.

The exercise is also useful from a benchmarking standpoint - though it would be more so if the results were not anonymised.

But, but, but…the scores disclosed would have to move an awful lot higher before governance across the sector could be considered remotely adequate.

The federations each answered 50 questions, with responses reviewed and graded on a scale between 0 and 4, giving a theoretical maximum score of 200.

No fewer than three of the seven bodies scored below 100, according to the 33-page report which can be read here.

A further three fell into the 100 to 125-mark bracket.

Only one – and the International Ski Federation has just unmasked itself as the federation in question - mustered the sort of score, 150, that one might hope to see across-the-board if strong governance were universally applied.

To give you an idea of topics on which replies seemed particularly disappointing:

• Information about financial benefits of officials and senior executives was said to be "lacking in most cases"; the mean score on this was just 1.14.

• Given the frequency of usage of the L-word - legacy - in the Olympic bubble in recent times, it seems remarkable that the same mean score of 1.14 was registered for "legacy programmes to assist communities in which events are hosted".

• Even something as basic as observing open tenders for major commercial and procurement contracts scored as low as 1.29 out of 4.

• Meanwhile, readers with some familiarity with the sector will be profoundly unsurprised to note that "term limits for elected officials" clocked up a mean score of just 0.57.

• Finally, one of my personal bugbears, still fewer than half of Olympic Winter sports federations – three - were said to have published full audited accounts, though this was at least up from two the previous year.

The thing is, while "governance" is about as far as you can get from a sexy word - even, I suspect, among insidethegames' discerning readership - this is not just some arcane number-crunching exercise undertaken by those of us who should get a life; it really matters.

Why? Well, as no less a figure than International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Thomas Bach explained at length - with reference to philosopher Immanuel Kant - in a keynote address to the last Olympic Congress in 2009, it is important that sport be able to regulate its own sport-specific affairs under its own responsibility and in accordance with general laws.

(Bach, you may recall, was deprived of an opportunity to defend an Olympic fencing title by Cold War politics.)

If sport is to be granted this brand of autonomy, however, then it seems clear to me that good governance needs to be part of the quid pro quo.

Self-regulation must be rigorous, universal and must eschew undue leniency to those in power.

The quality of governance and pace of progress suggested by this week’s report leave me questioning the extent to which the will to lift standards swiftly to the sort of level that ought to prevail truly exists in international sport's upper echelons.

It seems to me, after all, that the IOC could exert powerful leverage to get the job done much more quickly and effectively should it choose to do so.

How? Well, Lausanne provides financial support to Olympic sports federations in the wake of each edition of the Olympic Games: Vancouver 2010 produced a distribution to federations of $209 million (£162 million/€180 million), Sochi 2014 of $199 million (£154 million/€172 million).

When you consider that, according to the new report, three of the seven Winter Olympic sport federations earned less than CHF8 million (£6.3 million/$8 million/€7 million) in annual revenue on average between 2012 and 2015, and that none earned more than CHF50 million (£40 million/$51 million/€44 million), those IOC contributions make up a tidy slice of the overall winter sports income pie.

If the IOC were to use part of this income stream to incentivise good governance and penalise bad, my thought is that things would improve pretty rapidly.

Of course, even under those circumstances, some issues would take longer to address satisfactorily than others.

But over the span of a full Olympic cycle, I think the improvement would be a) dramatic and b) highly beneficial.

Source